Ultimate Strength and Nonlinear Response of Metallic I-Core Sandwich Pressure Hulls under Combined Axial Compression and Lateral Pressure


Abstract

This study investigates the ultimate strength and nonlinear structural response of metallic I-core sandwich pressure hulls as an alternative to conventional ring-stiffened submarine pressure-hull structures. A key comparative investigation is conducted between two I-core configurations that differ fundamentally in the orientation of their core webs, which are aligned either longitudinally or transversely relative to the longitudinal axis of the pressure hull. The proposed configurations are designed with approximately equivalent structural weights to the conventional ring-stiffened hull, providing a consistent basis for evaluating the influence of structural configuration and core-web orientation on the load-carrying performance. Nonlinear finite element analyses are performed using ANSYS Workbench under pure axial compression and combined axial compression with different levels of lateral pressure. The numerical modelling procedure incorporates material plasticity, large deformation effects, and initial geometric imperfections derived from linear eigenvalue buckling analysis. The ultimate strength of each pressure-hull configuration is determined from the peak axial load. The results demonstrate that core-web orientation significantly influences the nonlinear response and ultimate strength, with the longitudinal arrangement exhibiting the highest structural performance under the investigated loading conditions. This improvement is attributed to the alignment of the core webs with the axial loading direction, enhancing longitudinal load transfer, with ultimate capacities approximately 66.2% and 70.3% higher than the conventional hull at 0 and 2 MPa, respectively. These findings demonstrate the potential of metallic I-core sandwich construction as an efficient alternative for advanced pressure-hull applications.


References

[1] Eyiler, B., Bayraktarkatal, E., 2024. Investigation of optimum structures at submarine pressure hulls under hydrostatic pressure with finite element method. Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Technology. 2024(226), 25–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54926/jnamt.2024.1485025

[2] Yang, Y., Li, J.-J., Zhang, Y., et al., 2021. A semi-analytical analysis of strength and critical buckling behavior of underwater ring-stiffened cylindrical shells. Engineering Structures. 227, 111396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111396

[3] Cho, S.-R., Muttaqie, T., Do, Q.T., et al., 2018. Ultimate strength formulation considering failure mode interactions of ring-stiffened cylinders subjected to hydrostatic pressure. Ocean Engineering. 161, 242–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.04.083

[4] Nho, I.S., Ryu, J.W., Lim, S.J., et al., 2017. Buckling analysis of circular cylinders with initial imperfection subjected to hydrostatic pressure. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea. 54(3), 267–273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2017.54.3.267 (in Korean)

[5] Park, S.-H., Yu, Y.-J., Cho, S.-R., et al., 2026. An experimental and numerical study on the hydrostatic collapse of a scaled HY-80 pressure hull. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering. 18, 100731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2025.100731

[6] Ma, Q., Rejab, M.R.M., Siregar, J.P., et al., 2021. A review of the recent trends on core structures and impact response of sandwich panels. Journal of Composite Materials. 55(18), 2513–2555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998321990734

[7] Zhao, M., Han, Z., Shi, G., et al., 2026. Ultimate strength assessment of I-type sandwich panel considering coupled buckling and weld fracture failure. Ocean Engineering. 351, 124335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2026.124335

[8] Singh, P., Sheikh, J., Behera, B.K., 2024. Metal-faced sandwich composite panels: A review. Thin-Walled Structures. 195, 111376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.111376

[9] Zhong, Q., Wu, G., Han, Z., et al., 2022. Comparative investigation on ultimate strength of hull girder with laser-welded web-core sandwich deck. Ocean Engineering. 264, 112483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112483

[10] Elsaka, M., Guedes Soares, C., 2023. Review of the structural configuration and strength of metallic sandwich panels. In: Ringsberg, J.W., Guedes Soares, C. (Eds.). Advances in the Analysis and Design of Marine Structures. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA. pp. 837–847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003399759-92

[11] MacKay, J.R., van Keulen, F., Smith, M.J., 2011. Quantifying the accuracy of numerical collapse predictions for the design of submarine pressure hulls. Thin-Walled Structures. 49(1), 145–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2010.08.015

[12] Xu, S., Lin, J., Liu, B., et al., 2020. Experimental and numerical buckling analysis of cylindrical pressure hulls with multi-circular openings. Ocean Engineering. 214, 107689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107689

[13] Lee, M., Oh, D., 2026. Development of initial scantling formulas for submarine deep frames based on numerical analysis. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 14(4), 386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14040386

[14] Leão Shinoka, T.K., Netto, T.A., 2025. Structural optimization applied to submarine pressure hulls. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy. 11(1), 169–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-024-00376-4

[15] Cerik, B.C., Shin, H.-K., Cho, S.-R., 2013. Probabilistic ultimate strength analysis of submarine pressure hulls. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering. 5(1), 101–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0120

[16] Helal, M., Fathallah, E., Alghtani, A.H., et al., 2023. Minimizing buoyancy factor of metallic pressure-hull subjected to hydrostatic pressure. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing. 35(1), 769–793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32604/iasc.2023.025618

[17] Viljoen, H.C., Mahomed, N., Cupido, L.H., et al., 2022. Effect of corrosion thinning on depth of operation: Case study of an HY-80 steel submarine pressure hull. Marine Structures. 81, 103103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2021.103103

[18] Cho, S.-R., Muttaqie, T., Do, Q.T., et al., 2018. Experimental investigations on the failure modes of ring-stiffened cylinders under external hydrostatic pressure. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering. 10(6), 711–729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2017.12.002

[19] Zakki, A.F., Bae, D.M., Susilo, S., et al., 2017. Structure design and characteristic analysis of buckling strength on swedge frame pressure hull with finite element analysis. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 12(3), 821–833.

[20] Foryś, P., 2015. Optimization of cylindrical shells stiffened by rings under external pressure including their post-buckling behaviour. Thin-Walled Structures. 95, 231–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2015.07.012

[21] Prabu, B., Raviprakash, A.V., Rathinam, N., 2012. Numerical buckling analysis of thin cylindrical shells with combined distributed and local geometrical imperfections under uniform axial compression. International Journal of Computer Aided Engineering and Technology. 4(4), 295–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCAET.2012.047813

[22] Sreelatha, P.R., Mathai, A., 2012. Linear and nonlinear buckling analysis of stiffened cylindrical submarine hull. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology. 4(6), 3003–3009.

[23] Ahn, D., Kim, S.-Y., Shin, S.-C., et al., 2012. Nonlinear buckling characteristics of ring-stiffened circular cylinders under uniform external pressure. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology. 26(2), 79–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5574/KSOE.2012.26.2.079 (in Korean)

[24] Arjomandi, K., Taheri, F., 2011. A new look at the external pressure capacity of sandwich pipes. Marine Structures. 24(1), 23–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2010.12.001

[25] Elsaka, M., Guedes Soares, C., 2023. Ultimate strength behaviour and optimization of laser-welded web-core sandwich panels under in-plane compression. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 11(11), 2200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11112200

[26] Elsaka, M., Guedes Soares, C., 2026. Ultimate strength of scaled I-Core steel sandwich panels under combined axial compression and lateral pressure. Marine Structures. 109, 104080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2026.104080

[27] Yuan, K., Xia, Z., Wang, L., et al., 2025. Mechanical properties and failure analysis of ring-stiffened composite hulls under hydrostatic pressure. Composite Structures. 351, 118609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118609

[28] Prabu, B., Rathinam, N., Srinivasan, R., et al., 2009. Finite element analysis of buckling of thin cylindrical shell subjected to uniform external pressure. Journal of Solid Mechanics. 1(2), 148–158. Available from: https://oiccpress.com/jsm/article/view/12016

[29] Kim, D.K., Yang, H.Y., Li, S., et al., 2025. An updated design formula for predicting the compressive strength of plate: Elastic buckling and ultimate compressive strength. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 13(1), 113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13010113

[30] Ozguc, O., Das, P.K., Barltrop, N., 2006. A proposed method to evaluate hull girder ultimate strength. Ships and Offshore Structures. 1(4), 335–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1533/saos.2006.0132

[31] Piscopo, V., 2024. Ultimate strength of platings under uniaxial compression with edges elastically restrained against torsion: A new comprehensive approach. Journal of Marine Science and Application. 23(2), 443–459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-024-00426-1

[32] Park, S.-H., Lee, S.-M., Yu, Y.-J., et al., 2024. Residual strength of corroded ring-stiffened cylinder structures under external hydrostatic pressure. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering. 16, 100590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2024.100590

Online ISSN: 2661-3158, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.