Evaluating Maritime Security Risks in the Black Sea Region: The Rtotal Index and Adaptive Response Strategies (2022–2024)
Copyright © 2026 Prymachova Natalia, Arsenii Stakhov. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
Abstract
The Black Sea maritime transport system has experienced signiϐicant disruption since 2022 due to military conϐlict, geopolitical instability, and shifts in shipping routes. Under these conditions, maritime security has become a critical factor affecting navigational safety and macroeconomic resilience. This study reframes security expenditures as strategic investments that support business continuity and strengthen system resilience. An integrated dynamic risk assessment model, Rtotal, is developed to evaluate the combined inϐluence of geopolitical threats, economic losses, adaptive management capacity, and technological innovation on maritime transport. The methodology combines comparative analysis, mathematical modeling, and proxy indicators of maritime risk. The framework is applied to the Black Sea region using operational and market data from 2021–2024. The analysis integrates publicly available data from UNCTAD, the Ukrainian Sea Ports Authority, the Lloyd’s Market Association, and international freight monitoring systems. The Rtotal index declined from 0.95 at the peak of the regional crisis to 0.42, demonstrating the measurable contribution of resilience‑oriented management and technology‑based security measures, including vessel tracking and defensive risk mapping. This study contributes to maritime economics by providing a quantitative framework for assessing compound risks under prolonged geopolitical instability. The proposed model supports maritime authorities, port operators, and liner shipping companies in evaluating resilience strategies and investment decisions for high‑risk maritime environments.
Keywords: Maritime Security, Black Sea, Risk Index, Adaptive Management, Response Projects, Maritime Transport
References
[1] Bazaluk, O., 2017. The Theory of War and Peace: The Geophilosophy of Europe. Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
[2] UNCTAD, 2024. Review of Maritime Transport 2024: Navigating Maritime Choke Points. United Nations Publications: New York, NY, USA. Available from: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2024_en.pdf
[3] Notteboom, T., Pallis, T., Rodrigue, J.P., 2021. Disruptions and resilience in global container shipping and ports: The COVID-19 pandemic versus the 2008–2009 financial crisis. Maritime Economics & Logistics. 23(2), 179–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-020-00180-5
[4] Yap, W.Y., Yang, D., 2024. Geopolitical tension and shipping network disruption: Analysis of the Red Sea Crisis on container port calls. Journal of Transport Geography. 121, 104004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104004
[5] Lee, P.T.W., Song, Z.Y., Lin, C.W., et al., 2025. New framework of port logistics in the post-COVID-19 period with 6th-generation ports (6GP) model. Transport Reviews. 45(1), 77–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2024.2405205
[6] Stopford, M., 2009. Maritime Economics, 3rd ed. Routledge: London, UK.
[7] Fasii, B., 2023. War Risks in Shipping Contracts: The Impact of the Russo-Ukrainian Armed Conflict. Lex Portus. 9(3), 23–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.9.3.2023.2
[8] Ju, H., Zeng, Q., Haralambides, H., 2024. Consequences of freight rate volatility in liner shipping and the role of strategic alliances. Ocean & Coastal Management. 252, 107129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107129
[9] Lam, J.S.L., 2025. Maritime safety and risk analysis. Maritime Transport Research. 8, 100127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2024.100127
[10] Stakhov, A.Y., 2021. Managing shipping efficiency in the system of anti-crisis development strategies. Economic Innovations. 23(2(79)), 165–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2021.23.2(79).165-171 (in Ukrainian)
[11] Ke, R., Wang, X., Peng, P., 2024. Analysis of the Impact of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict on Global Liquefied Natural Gas Shipping Network. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 13(1), 53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13010053
[12] Gulen, M.F., Uflaz, E., Gumus, F., et al., 2025. An integrated SWOT-based interval type-2 fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methodology for digital transformation strategy selection in maritime safety. Ocean Engineering. 323, 120518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.120518
[13] Ducruet, C., 2020. The geography of maritime networks: A critical review. Journal of Transport Geography. 88, 102824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102824
[14] Reddy, G.P., Sinha, S., Park, S.H., 2024. Generative AI for the maritime environments. In Proceedings of 2024 Fifteenth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), Budapest, Hungary, 2–5 July 2024; pp. 618–623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUFN61752.2024.10625100
[15] Karakas, S., Kirmizi, M., Gencer, H., et al., 2024. A resilience assessment model for dry bulk shipping supply chains: The case of the Ukraine grain corridor. Maritime Economics & Logistics. 26, 391–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-023-00277-7
[16] Nitsenko, V., Vlasenko, T., Stakhov, A., et al., 2025. Threats to shipping in the Black Sea and their global impact. Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series Transport. 128, 145–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2025.128.9
[17] Shi, J., Jiao, Y., Chen, J., et al., 2023. Construction of resilience mechanisms in response to container shipping market volatility during the pandemic period. Ocean & Coastal Management. 240, 106642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106642
[18] Huang, X., Wen, Y., Zhang, F., et al., 2023. A review on risk assessment methods for maritime transport. Ocean Engineering. 279, 114577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114577
[19] Kotenko, S., Ilchenko, S., Kasianova, V., et al., 2023. Risk Assessment of Water Transport Enterprises by Modelling Direct and Indirect Threats. Economics Ecology Socium. 7(1), 15–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31520/2616-7107/2023.7.1-2
[20] Anne, O., Burskyte, V., Stasiskiene, Z., et al., 2015. The influence of the environmental management system on the environmental impact of seaport companies during an economic crisis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 22(2), 1072–1084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3410-x
[21] Prymacheva, N., Kolegayev, I., Lypynska, O., et al., 2023. Integration strategies for sustainable positioning of shipping companies in the maritime trade market systems. Economics, Ecology, Socium. 7(2), 79–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31520/2616-7107/2023.7.2-6
[22] Puig, M., Wooldridge, C., Darbra, R.M., 2014. Identification and selection of environmental performance indicators for sustainable port development. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 81(1), 124–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.02.006
[23] Cret, L., Baudry, M., Lantz, F., 2024. How to implement the 2023 IMO GHG strategy? Insights on the importance of combining policy instruments and on the role of uncertainty. Marine Policy. 169, 106332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106332
[24] Jović, M., Tijan, E., Brčić, D., et al., 2022. Digitalisation in maritime transport and seaports: Bibliometric, content and thematic analysis. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 10(4), 486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10040486
[25] Oh, H., Lee, S.-W., Seo, Y.-J., 2018. The evaluation of seaport sustainability: The case of South Korea. Ocean & Coastal Management. 161, 50–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.04.028
[26] Stakhov, A.Y., Prymachova, N.M., 2024. Patterns and trends in the formation of maritime trade market’s parameters. Actual Issues of Modern Science. European Scientific e-Journal. 33, 36–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47451/ecn2024-10-01
[27] Creswell, J.W., Creswell, J.D., 2017. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Sage Publications: London, UK.
[28] Mazur, Y., Chaikovska, M., Zaderei, A., et al., 2022. Management system for neutralizing the impact of risks on logistics processes during their dynamic changes. Scientific Bulletin of the National Mining University. (6), 170–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-6/170
[29] Pu, S., Lam, J.S.L., 2021. Blockchain adoptions in the maritime industry: A conceptual framework. Maritime Policy & Management. 48(6), 777–794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1825855
[30] Abakah, E.J.A., Abdullah, M., Dankwah, B., et al., 2024. Asymmetric dynamics between the Baltic Dry Index and financial markets during major global economic events. North American Journal of Economics and Finance. 72, 102126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2024.102126
[31] Acciaro, M., 2014. Real option analysis for environmental compliance: LNG and emission control areas. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 28, 41–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.007
[32] World Bank, 2024. The Container Port Performance Index 2023. World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA
[33] Lim, S., Pettit, S., Abouarghoub, W., et al., 2019. Port sustainability and performance: A systematic literature review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 72, 47–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.04.009
[34] Asian Development Bank, 2023. Methodological Framework for Unlocking Maritime Insights Using Automatic Identification System Data: A Special Supplement of Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2023. Asian Development Bank: Manila, Philippines. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22617/FLS230401-2
[35] Clarksons Research, n.d. Maritime & Shipping Research Services. Available at: https://www.clarksons.com/services/research/ (cited 6 July 2026).
[36] Lloyd’s Market Association (LMA), 2024. Joint War Risk Committee. Available from: https://lmalloyds.com/committee/joint-war-committee/ (cited 6 July 2026).
[37] Ukrainian Sea Ports Authority (USPA), 2024. Operational Performance of the Danube Port Cluster (2021–2024): Statistical Reports. USPA: Kyiv, Ukraine.
[38] Ministry of Communities, Territories and Infrastructure Development of Ukraine, 2024. Analytical Reports on the Functioning of the Ukrainian Sea Corridor. Ministry of Infrastructure.
[39] Kormych, B., Averochkina, T., 2023. Black Sea Grain Initiative is Dead, Long Live the New Trade Corridor. Lex Portus. 9(4), 7–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.9.4.2023.1
[40] Bodnar, O., Halchynska, Y., Larina, Y., et al., 2024. Logistics transformation on grain and oilseeds markets during the war in Ukraine: Marketing approaches and strategies. Scientific Horizons. 27(9), 134–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor9.2024.134