Interval-Based Multi-Body Dynamics Simulation of Special-Purpose Vessels in Rough Sea Conditions
Copyright © 2025 Nijalingappa Yogeesh, Suleiman Ibrahim Shelash Mohammad, Natarajan Raja, Asokan Vasudevan, Thirumalesha Babu Tumkur Rangaswamy, Ashalatha Kodihalli Siddagangaiah, Anber Abraheem Mohammad. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
Abstract
Vessel motions in offshore operations are heavily influenced by uncertain wave loads and hydrodynamic parameters. Yet, traditional deterministic or probabilistic models often fail to capture epistemic ambiguity when data are scarce. We introduce a fuzzy–set framework using α-cut interval analysis to represent imprecise wave heights, periods, added mass, damping, and stiffness as fuzzy numbers. These are incorporated into the multi-body equations of motion and solved via a fuzzy Runge–Kutta scheme across nested α-levels. A simulation architecture iterates over α-cuts and time-steps to produce interval bounds on heavy responses. A case study off the Karnataka coast, with realistic sea-state data for moderate and severe scenarios, yields heave-amplitude envelopes whose widths quantify response uncertainty. At mid-confidence (α = 0.5), moderate seas produce amplitudes of 8.30–9.65 m (± 15 %), while severe seas yield 7.15–8.90 m (± 22 %). Envelope narrowing as α→1 confirms that increased parameter confidence reduces prediction spread, and bias analysis against crisp baselines highlights the impact of imprecision on mean responses. This non-probabilistic approach provides interpretable, worst- and best-case motion bounds without requiring large datasets, offering marine engineers robust safety margins and guidance for targeted data collection and real-time uncertainty updating.
Keywords: Epistemic Uncertainty, α-Cut Interval Analysis, Interval Arithmetic, Hydrodynamic Modelling, Heave Response, Marine Structures, Wave-Induced Motion
References
[1] Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control. 8(3), 338–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
[2] Ma, X.F., Li, T.J, 2018. Dynamic Analysis of Uncertain Structures Using an Interval-Wave Approach. International Journal of Applied Mechanics. 10(2), 1850021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1758825118500217
[3] Newman, J.N., 1977. Marine Hydrodynamics. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4443.001.0001
[4] Faltinsen, O.M., 1990. Sea Loads on Ships and Offshore Structures. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
[5] Hajinezhadian, M., Behnam, B., 2023. A Probabilistic Approach to Lifetime Design of Offshore Platforms. Scientific Reports. 13, 7101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34362-x
[6] Cartagena, O., Parra, S., Munoz-Carpintero, D., et al., 2021. Review on Fuzzy and Neural Prediction Interval Modelling for Nonlinear Dynamical Systems. IEEE Access. 9, 23357–23384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3056003
[7] Klir, G.J., Yuan, B., 1995. Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
[8] Moore, R., Lodwick, W., 2003. Interval Analysis and Fuzzy Set Theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 135(1), 5–9.
[9] Moore, R.E., 1966. Interval Analysis. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
[10] Zimmermann, H.J., 2001. Fuzzy Set Theory—And Its Applications, 4th ed. Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0646-0
[11] Chakrabarti, S.K., 2018. Hydrodynamics of Offshore Structures. WIT Press: Southampton, UK, Germany.
[12] Faltinsen, O. M., 2005. Hydrodynamics of High-Speed Marine Vehicles. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA.
[13] Cai, Z., Zhang, B.L., Han, Q.L., et al., 2025. Sampled-Data Fuzzy Modeling and Control for Offshore Structures Subject to Parametric Perturbations and Wave Loads. Ocean Engineering. 326, 120908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.120908
[14] Hao, L.Y., Zhang, H., Li, T.S., et al., 2021. Fault Tolerant Control for Dynamic Positioning of Unmanned Marine Vehicles Based on TS Fuzzy Model with Unknown Membership Functions. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. 70(1), 146–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2021.3050044
[15] Lopez-Pavon, C., Souto-Iglesias, A., 2015. Hydrodynamic Coefficients and Pressure Loads on Heave Plates for Semi-Submersible Floating Offshore Wind Turbines: A Comparative Analysis Using Large Scale Models. Renewable Energy. 81, 864–881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.04.003
[16] Chakraverty, S., Mahato, N.R., 2018. Nonlinear Interval Eigenvalue Problems for Damped Spring-Mass System. Engineering Computations. 35(6), 2272–2286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-04-2017-0128
[17] Zhao, Y., Lin, F., Guo, G., 2023. Composite Anti-Disturbance Dynamic Positioning for Mass-Switched Unmanned Marine Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles. 9(1), 1890–1898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2023.3279296
[18] Wang, W., Zhou, L., Xia, X., et al., 2021. Analysis of the hydrodynamic Damping Characteristics on a Symmetrical Hydrofoil. Renewable Energy. 178, 821–829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.026
[19] Mohammad, A.A.S., Mohammad, S.I.S., Al Oraini, B., et al., 2025. Data Security in Digital Accounting: A Logistic Regression Analysis of Risk Factors. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies. 8(1), 2699–2709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i1.5044
[20] Smirnov, G.V., 2002. Introduction to the Theory of Differential Inclusions. American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA.
[21] Mohammad, A.A., Shelash, S.I., Saber, T.I., et al., 2025. Internal Audit Governance Factors and Their Effect on the Risk-Based Auditing Adoption of Commercial Banks in Jordan. Data and Metadata. 4, 464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025464
[22] Guachamin-Acero, W., Li, L., 2018. Methodology for Assessment of Operational Limits Including Uncertainties in Wave Spectral Energy Distribution for Safe Execution of Marine Operations. Ocean Engineering. 165, 184–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.07.032
[23] Al-Rahmi, W.M., Al-Adwan, A.S., Al-Maatouk, Q., et al., 2023. Integrating Communication and Task–Technology Fit Theories: The Adoption of Digital Media in Learning. Sustainability. 15(10), 8144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108144
[24] Kaleva, O., 1987. Fuzzy Differential Equations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 24(3), 301–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(87)90029-7
[25] Mohammad, A.A.S., Mohammad, S.I.S., Al-Daoud, K.I., et al., 2025. Optimizing the Value Chain for Perishable Agricultural Commodities: A Strategic Approach for Jordan. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 6(1), 465–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i1.1571
[26] Alefeld, G., Herzberger, J., 1983. Introduction to Interval Computations. Academic Press: New York, NY, USA.
[27] Yaseen, H., Al-Adwan, A.S., Nofal, M., et al., 2023. Factors Influencing Cloud Computing Adoption Among SMEs: The Jordanian Context. Information Development. 39(2), 317–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211047916
[28] Puri, M., Ralescu, D.R., 1983. Differentiability of Fuzzy‐Valued Functions. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 91(2), 552–558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(83)90169-5
[29] Mohammad, A.A.S., Mohammad, S.I.S., Al-Daoud, K.I., et al., 2025. Digital Ledger Technology: A Factor Analysis of Financial Data Management Practices in the Age of Blockchain in Jordan. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies. 8(2), 2567–2577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i2.5737
[30] Tanaka, K., Wang, H.O., 2001. Fuzzy Control Systems Design and Analysis: A Linear Matrix Inequality Approach. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA.