An Empirical Assessment of Rural Economic Sustainability: Panel Evidence from the Akmola Region
Copyright © 2026 Murat Balpan, Oleg Patlasov, Yerzhan Zharov, Anargul Belgibayeva. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
Abstract
Sustainable development of rural territories remains essential for balanced regional growth, food security, and demographic stability. Nevertheless, rural areas continue to face structural challenges such as depopulation, weak investment activity, and strong dependence on public finances. These conditions require empirically grounded approaches for measuring rural economic sustainability and identifying its determinants at the municipal level. This study proposes an integral index of rural economic sustainability that combines demographic, economic, and environmental indicators using Min–Max normalization and additive aggregation with equal weights. The empirical analysis is based on a balanced panel dataset of 17 rural districts of the Akmola region for 2019–2024. The index values range from 0.22 to 0.62, revealing significant spatial disparities that appear structural rather than temporary. To identify the factors influencing these differences, the integral index is used as a dependent variable in panel regression models. Based on specification tests, the fixed-effects model is selected as the most appropriate. The findings reveal a statistically significant negative relationship between the social orientation coefficient of local budgets and rural economic sustainability (β ≈ −0.057, p < 0.01). This suggests that higher social expenditures often reflect fiscal pressure in economically weaker territories rather than contributing to immediate sustainability improvements. Other institutional and management variables show no statistically significant effects within the observed period. Overall, the results indicate that rural economic sustainability in the Akmola region is primarily shaped by long-term structural and institutional conditions, while fiscal policy plays an important but ambiguous role.
Keywords: Economic Sustainability, Rural Areas, Integral Index, Regional Development, Panel Regression, Municipal Areas, Budget Policy
References
[1] World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
[2] Stiglitz, J.E., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J.-P., 2009. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. UNESCO: Paris, France.
[3] OECD, European Union, EC-JRC, 2008. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. OECD Publishing: Paris, France. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264043466-en
[4] Booysen, F., 2002. An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development. Social Indicators Research. 59(2), 115–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016275505152
[5] Paruolo, P., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., 2013. Ratings and rankings: Voodoo or science? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A. 176(3), 609–634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01059.x
[6] Angilella, S., Catalfo, P., Corrente, S., et al., 2018. Robust sustainable development assessment with composite indices aggregating interacting dimensions: The hierarchical-SMAA-Choquet integral approach. arXiv preprint. arXiv: 1801.05265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.05265
[7] Shucksmith, M., 2018. Re-imagining the rural. Journal of Rural Studies. 59, 163–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.019
[8] Baltagi, B.H., 2021. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 6th ed. Springer: Cham, Switzerland.
[9] Saltelli, A., 2007. Composite indicators between analysis and advocacy. Social Indicators Research. 81(1), 65–77.
[10] OECD, 2025. Reinforcing Rural Resilience: Policy Responses to Demographic, Economic and Environmental Challenges. OECD Publishing: Paris, France. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/7cd485e3-en
[11] Kim, Y.-S., Kim, M.K., Fu, N., et al., 2024. Investigating the impact of data normalization methods on predicting electricity consumption in a building using different artificial neural network models. Sustainable Cities and Society. 1118, 105570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105570
[12] Aziz, S., Sharif, A., Mishra, S., et al., 2024. Environmental decentralization and green economic growth. Environmental Development. 50, 101014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101014
[13] Pandoyo, 2024. The role of fiscal decentralization in sustainable local economic development. Journal of Regional Finance and Development. 12(2), 45–62.
[14] Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., Tomaney, J., 2017. Shifting horizons in local and regional development. Regional Studies. 51(1), 46–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1158802
[15] Barbero, J., Christensen, M., Conte, A., et al., 2023. Improving Government Quality in the Regions of the EU and its System-Wide Benefits for Cohesion Policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 61(1), 38–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13337
[16] Georgescu, P.-L., Barbuta-Misu, N., Zlati, M.L.,et al., 2025. Quantifying the Performance of European Agriculture Through the New European Sustainability Model. Agriculture. 15(2), 210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15020210
[17] Sachan, A., Pradhan, A.K., Mohindra, V. et al., 2025. A bibliometric analysis of key drivers, trends, and research collaboration on environmental degradation. Discover Sustainability. 6, 350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01033-y
[18] Georgescu, L.P., Ionescu, R.-V., Antohi, V.-M., et al., 2025. A New Model for Quantifying the Impact of the Social Economy on the Sustainability of Water Resources. Water. 17(4), 561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w17040561
[19] Scoones, I., Stirling, A., Abrol, D., et al., 2020. Transformations to Sustainability: Combining Structural, Systemic and Enabling Approaches. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 42, 65–75.
[20] Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2024. Soltustik Kazakhstan: Summary of the socio-economic development of the region. Available from: https://stat.gov.kz/region/sko/ (cited 22 December 2025).
[21] Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2024. State and State Guaranteed Debt, State Guarantees Debt (Subsidiary Liabilities) as of October 1, 2025. Available from: https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/minfin/documents/details/917198?lang=en (cited 22 December 2025).
[22] Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Available from: https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/moa/documents/details/939415?lang=en (cited 22 December 2025).
[23] Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Available from: https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/ecogeo/documents/1?lang=en&type=_31 (cited 22 December 2025).
[24] Akilzhanova, L., Zhanseitov, A., Belgibayeva, K., et al., 2025. State governance of information processes in Kazakhstan’s regions. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 6(4), 784–797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i4.2832
[25] Aigerim, A., Saule, I., Aliya, D., et al., 2025. The impact of Digital HRM and public sector performance: A quantitative analysis of service delivery efficiency. Economics of Innovation and Research. 13(3), 303–318.
[26] Zubarevich, N.V., Safronov, S.G., 2024. Interregional Inequality in Russia and Post-Soviet Countries in the 21st Century. Regional Research of Russia. 14(4), 513–524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970524600537
[27] World Bank, 2023. Spatial Inequalities. World Bank Publications: Washington, DC, USA.
[28] UNDP, 2024. Human Development Report 2023/2024: Breaking the Gridlock: Reimagining Cooperation in a Polarized World. United Nations Development Programme: New York, NY, USA.
[29] OECD, 2023. Rural Well-Being: Geography of Opportunities. OECD Publishing: Paris, France.