Home
Open Access

Research on World Agricultural Economy

PDF

Issue

Volume 7 Issue 3 (September 2026)

Section

Article

How to Cite

Loading...

Determinants of Farm Commercialization in Tidal Wetland Rice Farming

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v7i3.105568

Received: 25 December 2025 | Revised: 2 February 2026 | Accepted: 12 February 2026 | Published Online: 7 September 2026

Copyright © 2026 Dina Omayani Dewi, Rita Nurmalina, Netti Tinaprilla, Saptana. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.

Abstract

Tidal lowlands are increasingly promoted for rice production in Indonesia in response to rising food demand and limited availability of suitable agricultural land. However, rice farming in these environments is characterized by unstable water regimes, high production risk, and weak market integration, which often limit farmers' transition from subsistence to commercial production despite increased use of modern inputs. This study examines the level and determinants of rice farming commercialization in the tidal lowlands of Sambas Regency, West Kalimantan, Indonesia, with explicit attention to agroecological risk. Primary data were collected through structured interviews with 143 rice farmers operating under different tidal overflow conditions. Commercialization is analyzed using multiple indicators capturing output sales, input market engagement, and cash income, and their determinants are examined using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression. The results indicate that rice farming in the study area is evolving toward semi-commercial systems, marked by strong integration into input markets but limited output commercialization and cash income. Tidal overflow conditions significantly shape commercialization outcomes, highlighting the role of agroecological risk in constraining surplus generation. Larger farm size, higher education levels, and the adoption of standard operating procedures (SOPs) are associated with stronger market participation, while higher household consumption needs and access to credit are negatively related to output sales and farm cash income, suggesting that credit is frequently used for consumption smoothing rather than productive investment. Overall, the findings reveal a segmented commercialization pathway in tidal rice systems and underscore the need for risk-reducing water management, improved farmer capacity, and better-targeted rural credit to support sustainable commercialization in tidal lowland agriculture.

Keywords: Tidal Wetlands, Rice Commercialization, Farm Product Sold Ratio, Input Market Integration, Semi-Commercial Farming, Credit Utilization, Land Management, Technology Adoption

References

[1]Susilawati, A., Wahyudi, E., Minsyah, N., 2018. Technology Development for Sustainable Tidal Swamp Management. Journal of Suboptimal Lands. 6(1), 87–94. Available from: https://jlsuboptimal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jlso/article/view/295 (in Indonesian)

[2]Paiman, Ardiyanta, Ansar, M., et al., 2020. Rice Cultivation of Superior Variety in Swamps to Increase Food Security in Indonesia. Reviews in Agricultural Science. 8, 300–309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7831/ras.8.0_300

[3]Iddrisu, A., Nkegbe, P.K., Mabe, F.N., 2025. Market participation intensity of smallholder farmers in the Northern Region of Ghana. Discover Agriculture. 3(1), 236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-025-00417-y

[4]Alhassan, I., Teklehaimanot, A., Solomon, N., et al., 2025. Perception and trends of climate change: Assessing impacts on smallholder farmers and Agro-Pastoral communities in Northern Ethiopia. Discover Agriculture. 3(1), 106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-025-00272-x

[5]Sanka, M., Makhura, M.N., 2025. Participation and utilisation levels of smallholder farmers agricultural credit guarantee scheme in Shinyanga and Iringa Regions, Tanzania. Discover Food. 5(1), 233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44187-025-00543-y

[6]Chichongue, O., Van Tol, J., Ceronio, G., et al., 2020. Effects of Tillage Systems and Cropping Patterns on Soil Physical Properties in Mozambique. Agriculture. 10(10), 448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10100448

[7]Sitindaon, M.A., Alamsyah, Z., Damayanti, Y., 2021. Factors Affecting Marketed Surplus of Rice Farming Households in Berbak Sub-District, East Tanjung Jabung Regency. Jambi University: Jambi City, Indonesia. Available from: https://repository.unja.ac.id/2893/1/Full%20Artikel%20Mona%20Ardian%20Sitindaon.pdf (in Indonesian)

[8]Haryanto, T., Wardana, W.W., Jamil, I.R., et al., 2023. Impact of credit access on farm performance: Does source of credit matter? Heliyon. 9(9), e19720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19720

[9]Bravo-Ureta, B.E., Higgins, D., Arslan, A., 2020. Irrigation infrastructure and farm productivity in the Philippines: A stochastic Meta-Frontier analysis. World Development. 135, 105073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105073

[10]Baylie, M.M., Pércsi, K.N., 2025. Examining access and impact of agricultural extension services on crop yield in Farta Woreda, Ethiopia, using endogenous switching regression model. Agriculture & Food Security. 14(1), 32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-025-00559-8

[11]Susilawati, A., Izhar, L., Sustama, A.A.S., 2025. Land Management of Tidal Swamp Type B with Surjan System as Climate Change Anticipation. Agromet. 39(1), 8–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/j.agromet.39.1.8-20

[12]Jaleta, M., Gebremedhin, B., Hoekstra, D., 2009. Smallholder Commercialization: Processes, Determinants and Impact. International Livestock Research Institute: Nairobi, Kenya.

[13]Mboma, A.B., Kilima, F.T.M., Mchopa, A.D., et al., 2026. Determinants of commercialization among smallholder maize farmers in Tanzania: A Tobit regression analysis. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 12(1), 2612201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2025.2612201

[14]Pingali, P.L., 1997. From Subsistence to Commercial Production Systems: The Transformation of Asian Agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 79(2), 628–634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1244162

[15]Miriti, P.K., Lambarraa-Lehnhardt, F., 2025. Understanding farmer preferences and trade-offs for adopting sustainable crop production: A systematic review. Discover Sustainability. 6(1), 760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01591-1

[16] Just, R.E., Pope, R.D., 1979. Production Function Estimation and Related Risk Considerations. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 61(2), 276–284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1239732

[17]Wharton, C.R., 2017. Subsistence Agriculture: Concepts and Scope. In Subsistence Agriculture & Economic Development. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 12–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315130408-4

[18]Barrett, C.B., Christiaensen, L., Sheahan, M., et al., 2017. On the Structural Transformation of Rural Africa. World Bank: Washington, DC, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7938

[19]Geffersa, A.G., Tabe-Ojong, M.P.J., 2024. Smallholder commercialisation and rural household welfare: Panel data evidence from Ethiopia. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 51(1), 54–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbad040

[20]Adjognon, S.G., Liverpool-Tasie, L.S.O., Reardon, T.A., 2017. Agricultural input credit in Sub-Saharan Africa: Telling myth from facts. Food Policy. 67, 93–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.014

[21]Muraoka, R., Jin, S., Jayne, T.S., 2018. Land access, land rental and food security: Evidence from Kenya. Land Use Policy. 70, 611–622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.045

[22]Sibhatu, K.T., Qaim, M., 2017. Rural food security, subsistence agriculture, and seasonality. PLOS ONE. 12(10), e0186406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186406

[23]Jumrani, J., 2023. How responsive are nutrients in India? Some recent evidence. Food Policy. 114, 102379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102379

[24]Kajisa, K., Vu, T.T., 2023. The importance of farm management training for the African rice Green Revolution: Experimental evidence from rainfed lowland areas in Mozambique. Food Policy. 114, 102401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102401

[25]Von Braun, J., Kennedy, E., 1994. Agricultural Commercialization, Economic Development, and Nutrition. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA.

[26]Namara, R.E., Hussain, I., Bossio, D., et al., 2007. Innovative land and water management approaches in Asia: Productivity impacts, adoption prospects and poverty outreach. Irrigation and Drainage. 56(2–3), 335–348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.308

[27]Subudhi, P.K., Shankar, R., Jain, M., 2020. Whole genome sequence analysis of rice genotypes with contrasting response to salinity stress. Scientific Reports. 10(1), 21259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78256-8

[28]Upadhyaya, A., Singh, A.K., 2019. Land and water management strategies for improving agricultural productivity of farmers. Journal of Agrisearch. 6(Special Issue), 1–3. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337888112_Land_and_Water_Management_Strategies_for_Improving_Agricultural_Productivity_of_Farmers

[29]Strasberg, P.J., Jayne, T.S., Yamano, T., et al., 1999. Effects of Agricultural Commercialization on Food Crop Input Use and Productivity in Kenya. Michigan State University: East Lansing, MI, USA. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46471915_Effects_of_Agricultural_Commercialization_on_Food_Crop_Input_Use_and_Productivity_in_Kenya

[30]Wahdat, A.Z., Gunderson, M.A., Lusk, J.L., 2021. Farm Producers’ Household Consumption and Individual Risk Behavior after Natural Disasters. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. 50(1), 127–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/age.2021.2

[31]Neme, A.A., Tefera, T.L., 2021. A review on commercialization of smallholder agricultural producers and its impacts on household livelihoods. Evidence from Ethiopia context. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development. 59(1), 69–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17306/J.JARD.2021.01393

[32]Benjamin, S., David, A., 2020. The Effect of Credit-Use on the Profitability of Smallholder Maize-Farming in Ghana. Global Scientific Journal. 8(5), 1049–1067. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341779535_The_Effect_of_Credit-Use_on_the_Profitability_of_Smallholder_Maize-Farming_in_Ghana

[33]Rituay, P., Aldea, C., Otoya-Barrenechea, J., et al., 2026. Agricultural Credit, Farm Performance and Technology Adoption Under Credit Rationing in Peru. Sustainability. 18(6), 2761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su18062761

[34]Ogunleye, W., 2018. Output Market Participation by Smallholders Rice Farmers in Obafemi Owode Local Government Area, Ogun State, Nigeria. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE), Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 28–August 2 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.277055

[35]Suryadi, F.X., 2020. Soil and Water Management Strategies for Tidal Lowlands in Indonesia. Institute for Water Education: Delft, Netherlands. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/F-Suryadi/publication/36012324_Soil_and_water_management_strategies_for_tidal_lowlands_in_Indonesia/links/5759639308ae414b8e43b265/Soil-and-water-management-strategies-for-tidal-lowlands-in-Indonesia.pdf

[36]Mottaleb, K.A., Mohanty, S., 2015. Farm size and profitability of rice farming under rising input costs. Journal of Land Use Science. 10(3), 243–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2014.919618

[37]Zeller, M., Sharma, M., 2000. Many borrow, more save, and all insure: Implications for food and micro-finance policy. Food Policy. 25(2), 143–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(99)00065-2

[38]Lingaiah, N., Raju, Ch.S., Sarla, N., et al., 2020. Genetic Architecture of Grain Quality Traits in Nutrient Rich Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Crosses. Agricultural Science Digest. 40(3), 255–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.D-5121

[39]Benitez-Altuna, F., Trienekens, J., Materia, V.C., et al., 2021. Factors affecting the adoption of ecological intensification practices: A case study in vegetable production in Chile. Agricultural Systems. 194, 103283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103283

[40]Van Campenhout, B., Bizimungu, E., 2018. Risk and returns of sustainable crop intensification: The case of smallholder rice and potato farmers in Uganda. Development Policy Review. 36(S2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12356

[41]Heltberg, R., Tarp, F., 2002. Agricultural supply response and poverty in Mozambique. Food Policy. 27(2), 103–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(02)00006-4

[42]Mano, Y., Takahashi, K., Otsuka, K., 2020. Mechanization in land preparation and agricultural intensification: The case of rice farming in the Cote d’Ivoire. Agricultural Economics. 51(6), 899–908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12599

[43]Reardon, T., Taylor, J.E., Stamoulis, K., et al., 2000. Effects of Non‐Farm Employment on Rural Income Inequality in Developing Countries: An Investment Perspective. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 51(2), 266–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2000.tb01228.x

Online ISSN: 2737-4777, Print ISSN: 2737-4785, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.