Circular Agricultural Economy and Rural Sustainable Livelihoods: A Dual Perspective of Resource Efficiency and Income Diversification


Abstract

Under the conceptual framework of China’s rural revitalization strategy and sustainable development vision, this study aims to perform a quantitative analysis of the general impact of engagement with circular agriculture practices on sustainable livelihoods. In this study, which is based on data from the 2020 round of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) survey that covers 856 rural households from five provinces, endogenous switching regression and mediation analysis are used to explore two transmission mechanisms: resource efficiency and income diversification. The results suggest that engaging in circular agriculture is associated with an Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) of 0.078, which is a 16.8% increase over the counterfactual mean. The mediation analysis suggests that income diversification is a mediator that explains 25.6% of the total effect, while resource efficiency is a mediator that explains 17.9% through input cost savings. The analysis also suggests that larger farms benefit more from engaging in circular agriculture (ATT = 0.098), while those with higher educational attainment (ATT = 0.094) and those from eastern provinces (ATT = 0.089) also benefit more from engaging in circular agriculture. However, those with lower initial livelihood levels benefit more from engaging in circular agriculture, which suggests an equalizing effect.


References

[1] Peng, J., Baležentis, T., Streimikiene, D., et al., 2025. Circular economy in agriculture: A systematic literature review. Sustainable Development. 33(S1), 501–516.

[2] Xu, J., 2024. Spatial spillover and threshold effects of digital rural development on agricultural circular economy growth. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 8, 1337637.

[3] Guo, C., Zhang, R., Zou, Y., 2023. The efficiency of China’s agricultural circular economy and its influencing factors under the rural revitalization strategy: A DEA–Malmquist–Tobit approach. Agriculture. 13(7), 1454.

[4] Payne, A., Kwofie, E.M., 2024. Unleashing circular economy potential in agriculture: Integrating social impact assessment with the ReSOLVE framework as a tool for sustainable development. Sustainable Development. 32(5), 5074–5089.

[5] Batlles-delaFuente, A., Abad-Segura, E., González-Zamar, M-D., et al., 2022. An evolutionary approach on the framework of circular economy applied to agriculture. Agronomy. 12(3), 620.

[6] Donner, M., Verniquet, A., Broeze, J., et al., 2021. Critical success and risk factors for circular business models valorising agricultural waste and by-products. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 165, 105236.

[7] Natarajan, N., Newsham, A., Rigg, J., et al., 2022. A sustainable livelihoods framework for the 21st century. World Development. 155, 105898.

[8] Amaliah, Y., Husni, A.H.A.A., Ansar, M.C., et al., 2025. The research landscape of rural sustainable livelihood: A scientometric analysis. Frontiers in Sustainability. 6, 1548378.

[9] Martinez-Baron, D., Alarcón de Antón, M., Martinez Salgado, J.D., et al., 2024. Climate-smart agriculture reduces capital-based livelihoods vulnerability: Evidence from Latin America. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 8, 1363101.

[10] Morse, S., 2025. Having Faith in the Sustainable Livelihood Approach: A Review. Sustainability. 17(2), 539.

[11] Ullah, A., Bavorova, M., Shah, A.A., et al., 2024. Climate change and rural livelihoods: The potential of extension programs for sustainable development. Sustainable Development. 32(5), 4992–5004.

[12] Mbewana, V., Kaseeram, I., 2024. The determinants of livelihood diversification among small-scale rural farmers in Alfred Nzo and King Cetshwayo District, South Africa. Cogent Economics & Finance. 12(1), 2368901.

[13] Ruben, R., 2024. What Smallholders Want: Effective Strategies for Rural Poverty Reduction. Sustainability. 16(13), 5525.

[14] Mobeen, M., Kabir, K.H., Schneider, U.A., et al., 2023. Sustainable livelihood capital and climate change adaptation in Pakistan's agriculture: Structural equation modeling analysis in the VIABLE framework. Heliyon. 9(11), e20818.

[15] Khanna, M., Zilberman, D., Hochman, G., et al., 2024. An economic perspective of the circular bioeconomy in the food and agricultural sector. Communications Earth & Environment. 5(1), 507.

[16] W/kidan, A., Tafesse, A., 2023. Determinants of Smallholder Farmers’ Income Diversification in Sodo Zuria District, Southern Ethiopia. Advances in Agriculture. 2023(1), 6038569.

[17] Danso-Abbeam, G., Dagunga, G., Ehiakpor, D.S., 2020. Rural non-farm income diversification: Implications on smallholder farmers' welfare and agricultural technology adoption in Ghana. Heliyon. 6(11), e05393.

[18] Alengebawy, A., Ran, Y., Osman, A.I., et al., 2024. Anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste for biogas production and sustainable bioenergy recovery: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 22(6), 2641–2668.

[19] Selvan, T., Panmei, L., Murasing, K.K., et al., 2023. Circular economy in agriculture: Unleashing the potential of integrated organic farming for food security and sustainable development. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 7, 1170380.

[20] Kumar, J.A., Sathish, S., Prabu, D., et al., 2023. Agricultural waste biomass for sustainable bioenergy production: Feedstock, characterization and pre-treatment methodologies. Chemosphere. 331, 138680.

[21] Helgason, K.S., Iversen, K., Julca, A., 2021. Circular Agriculture for Sustainable Rural Development. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations: New York, NY, USA.

[22] Toplicean, I.-M., Datcu, A.-D., 2024. An overview on bioeconomy in agricultural sector, biomass production, recycling methods, and circular economy considerations. Agriculture. 14(7), 1143.

[23] Mao, S., Qiu, S., Li, T., et al., 2020. Rural households’ livelihood strategy choice and livelihood diversity of main ethnic minorities in Chongqing, China. Sustainability. 12(19), 8166.

[24] Chuong, H.N., Loc, T.T., Tuyen, T.L.T., et al., 2024. Livelihood transitions in rural Vietnam under climate change effects in the period of 2008–2018. Discover Sustainability. 5(1), 5.

[25] Zhang, J., Fan, Z., Liu, J., et al., 2025. Livelihood capital, risk response, and rural household poverty vulnerability: An empirical experience based in China. Review of Development Economics. 29(3), 1693–1711.

[26] Xu, J., Lu, W., Wang, W., 2024. From “fragile smallholders” to “resilient smallholders”: Measuring rural household resilience in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 11(1), 1712.

[27] Su, F., Fan, B., Song, N., et al., 2025. Quantifying farmers' Livelihood Efficiency, Regional Indicators and Its Influencing Factors: Implementing an Improved Sustainable Livelihood Framework. Land Degradation & Development. 36(2), 490–506.

[28] Li, H., Nijkamp, P., Xie, X., et al., 2020. A new livelihood sustainability index for rural revitalization assessment—A modelling study on smart tourism specialization in China. Sustainability. 12(8), 3148.

[29] Bao, W., Wu, Y., Bao, H., 2024. Transaction costs, crop-livestock integration participation, and income effects in China. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 7, 1247770.

[30] Lei, X., Yang, D., 2024. An analysis of the impact of digital technology adoption on the income of high quality farmers in production and operating. PLOS One. 19(9), e0309675.

[31] Peng, Y., Guo, J., Liu, Y., et al., 2025. Will land transfer improve grain farmers’ adoption of agricultural green production technology? Evidence from Jiangxi Province, China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 12(1), 466.

[32] Jena, P.R., Tanti, P.C., 2023. Effect of farm machinery adoption on household income and food security: Evidence from a nationwide household survey in India. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 7, 922038.

[33] Heckman, J.J., Ichimura, H., Todd, P.E., 1997. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies. 64(4), 605–654.

[34] Abebaw, D., Haile, M.G., 2013. The impact of cooperatives on agricultural technology adoption: Empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Food Policy. 38, 82–91.

[35] Wonde, K.M., Tsehay, A.S., Lemma, S.E., 2022. Training at farmers training centers and its impact on crop productivity and households’ income in Ethiopia: A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Heliyon. 8(7), e09837.

[36] Der Tambile, E., Ramachandran, V.S., Rajendrakumar, S., et al., 2024. Rural livelihoods sustainability in South Asia and Africa: A systematic review with bibliometric analysis. Discover Sustainability. 5(1), 410.

[37] Fan, D., Yang, F., 2024. Assessing the impact of China's agricultural subsidy reform on fertilizer management: A county-level empirical analysis based on difference-in-difference model. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 7, 1298425.

[38] Li, X., Wu, L., Gao, H., et al., 2024. Can digital literacy improve organic fertilizer utilization rates? Empirical evidence from China. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 26(12), 31921–31946.

[39] Tolessa, A., 2024. Current status and future prospects of small‐scale household biodigesters in Sub‐Saharan Africa. Journal of Energy. 2024(1), 5596028.

[40] Zhang, Q., Ye, F., Razzaq, A., et al., 2025. The synergistic effects of green subsidy policies on grain and land productivity in China’s farming sector. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 11(1), 2572433.

[41] Wu, J., Xu, Y., Liu, Z., 2024. A comprehensive review on agricultural greenhouse gas emission reductions in China: opportunities and challenges. Carbon Footprints. 3, 17.

Online ISSN: 2737-4777, Print ISSN: 2737-4785, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.