Home
Open Access

Research on World Agricultural Economy

PDF

Issue

Volume 7 Issue 3 (September 2026)

Section

Article

How to Cite

Loading...

TOWARDS 2047: WHO WILL FEED THE CONSUMERS IN ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v7i3.105538

Received: 13 December 2025 | Revised: 22 January 2026 | Accepted: 30 January 2026 | Published Online: 24 August 2026

Copyright © 2026 Nirmal Ravi Kumar Kotamraju. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.

Abstract

This study looks into the spatial disparities in food production, landholding structure, agricultural resources, irrigation infrastructure, fertilizer and energy use, and allied sector performance across the 13 undivided districts of Andhra Pradesh during Triennium Ending (TE) 2021–22. The central objective is to identify which districts are best positioned to sustain and expand the state’s food production up to 2047—marking 100 years of Indian Independence—and to understand the structural constraints that shape regional agricultural potential. The analysis shows that agriculture and allied sectors contribute between 23% and 36% of GVA in nine of the thirteen districts; the coastal belt—East Godavari, West Godavari, Krishna, Guntur and Nellore—forms the core food-producing region of the state. All these districts reap the benefits of the Krishna–Godavari canal systems, high irrigation intensity (70–90%), relatively balanced fertilizer use, mechanization, and strong diversification into aquaculture. Fisheries have emerged as major economic drivers in East and West Godavari, especially vannamei shrimp farming, contributing over 70% of Andhra Pradesh’s aquaculture output. In sharp contrast, the Rayalaseema districts of Ananthapuramu, Kurnool and YSR Kadapa depend heavily on livestock due to semi-arid conditions and unstable crop yields, with animal husbandry contributing 25–35% of agricultural GVO. The landholding pattern indicates sharp structural inequalities: even as 75–88% of the holdings belong to marginal farmers, a lion’s share of the operated land remains concentrated among medium and large farmers, particularly in Chittoor, Guntur and West Godavari. Gini coefficients range from 0.38 for Ananthapuramu to 0.48 for Nellore, indicating persistent inequality that limits broad-based growth. Even the cropping pattern exhibits clear spatial differentiation: though paddy remains dominant in the coastal districts, millets and pulses are the dominant crops in the uplands but contribute little to total output. All in all, the findings suggest three critical factors which would determine whether Andhra Pradesh will be able to meet its food production requirements by 2047: irrigation intensity and water infrastructure, which continue to favour coastal districts; consolidation of landholdings and productivity enhancement of smallholders, which assumes significance for improving yields in high-inequality regions; and the expanding contribution of allied sectors, particularly fisheries and livestock, which increasingly supplement and stabilize the state’s food system.

Keywords: Andhra Pradesh agriculture, district disparities, irrigation intensity, landholding inequality, food production

References

[1]Government of India, 2023. Agricultural Census 2020–21. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare: New Delhi, India.

[2]Narayanan, S., Vijayabaskar, M., Srinivasan, S., 2024. The Youth Dividend and Agricultural Revival in India. In: Srinivasan, S. (Ed.). Becoming A Young Farmer, Rethinking Rural. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 221–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15233-7_8

[3]International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), 2021. Transforming Food Systems for Rural Prosperity. IFAD: Rome, Italy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.313753

[4]Godfray, H.C.J., Beddington, J.R., Crute, I.R., et al., 2010. Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People. Science. 327(5967), 812–818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383

[5]Hunter, M.C., Smith, R.G., Schipanski, M.E., et al., 2017. Agriculture in 2050: Recalibrating Targets for Sustainable Intensification. BioScience. 67(4), 386–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix010

[6]United Nations (UN), 2019. World Population Prospects 2019. UN: New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/13bf5476-en

[7]Alexandratos, N., Bruinsma, J., 2012. World Agriculture Towards 2030/2050: The 2012 revision. Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.288998

[8]Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., et al., 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108(50), 20260–20264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108

[9]Springmann, M., Clark, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., et al., 2018. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature. 562(7728), 519–525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0

[10]Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., et al., 2019. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet. 393(10170), 447–492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4

[11]Ricciardi, V., Ramankutty, N., Mehrabi, Z., et al., 2018. How much of the world’s food do smallholders produce? Global Food Security. 17, 64–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.05.002

[12]Herrero, M., Thornton, P.K., Power, B., et al., 2017. Farming and the geography of nutrient production for human use: A transdisciplinary analysis. The Lancet Planetary Health. 1(1), e33–e42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30007-4

[13]Van Ittersum, M.K., Van Bussel, L.G.J., Wolf, J., et al., 2016. Can sub-Saharan Africa feed itself? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113(52), 14964–14969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610359113

[14]Thasni, T., Gangopadhyay, K., Mondal, D., 2024. Structural transformation of the Indian states: heterogeneity among them in a ten-sector economy. Indian Growth and Development Review. 17(2), 232–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IGDR-10-2023-0178

[15]Tanuja, N., Kumar, K.N.R., Rao, I.R., et al., 2024. Dynamics of crop diversification in Andhra Pradesh: A District-Level Analysis. International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social Development. 7(12S), 33–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/26180723.2024.v7.i12Sa.1445

[16]Directorate of Economics and Statistics (DES), 2023. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance. DES: New Delhi, India.

[17]Narayanamoorthy, A., 2022. The Irrigation Future of India: Development, Resource and Policy, Global Issues in Water Policy. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89613-3

[18]Shirisha, T., Harsha, I., Babu, C.S., 2025. Drought management in Indian agriculture: Challenges, strategies, and sustainable solutions. The Pharma Innovation. 14(7), 50–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/tpi.2025.v14.i7a.26184

[19]Yadav, D., Babu, S., Yadav, D.K., et al., 2024. Cropping System Intensification: Implications on Food Security and Environmental Sustainability in India. Anthropocene Science. 3(1–2), 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44177-024-00078-4

[20]National Sample Survey Office (NSSO), 2021. Household Land and Livestock Holdings Survey. NSSO: New Delhi, India.

[21]Birthal, P.S., Hazrana, J., Negi, D.S., et al., 2022. Assessing benefits of crop insurance vis-a-vis irrigation in Indian agriculture. Food Policy. 112, 102348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102348

[22]Gupta, P., 2025. A Systematic Review on Women’s Participation in Agricultural Work and Nutritional Outcomes. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2504.03202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.03202

[23]Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), 2023. Annual Report 2022–23. ICAR: New Delhi, India.

[24]Jaikisan Organics, n.d. Andhra Pradesh Agriculture Report. Available from: https://jaikisanorganics.com/reports/andhra-pradesh (cited 13 November 2025).

[25]Marine Products Export Development Authority (MPEDA), n.d. Homepage. Available from: https://mpeda.gov.in (cited 13 November 2025).

[26]Basantaray, A.K., Acharya, S., Patra, T., 2024. Crop diversification and income of agricultural households in India: An empirical analysis. Discover Agriculture. 2(1), 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-024-00019-0

[27]Chaithanya, G.K., Peter, Y.S., Sahu, B.L., et al., 2025. Analysis of Maize Area, Production and Productivity Trends: A Study of Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International. 47(2), 476–482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2025/v47i23307

[28]Likhitha, S., Anbukkani, P., 2025. Production performance of maize in India: An economic analysis. Annals of Agricultural Research. 46(1), 35–44. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389701444_Production_Performance_of_Maize_in_India_An_Economic_Analysis

[29]Kumar, K.N.R., Babu, T.R., 2025. Diversifying Agricultural Growth: Investigating the Economic Consequences of Crop Diversification in Andhra Pradesh, India. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 467–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i2.1660

[30]Vijaya Krishna, R., 2023. Impact of Minor Irrigation on Rural Livelihoods of Andhra Pradesh: A Study in Vizianagaram District. Journal of Food and Agriculture Research. 3(2), 129–144. Available from: https://www.arfjournals.com/image/catalog/Journals%20Papers/JFAR/2023/No%202%20(2023)/3_Vijaya%20Krishna.pdf

[31]Madhurima, U., Karunakaran, K.R., Kumar, D.S., et al., 2022. Structural Changes in Irrigation Vis-à-vis Cropping Pattern in Andhra Pradesh, India: An Economic Analysis. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology. 628–640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2022/v40i111754

[32]Lakshmi, R., Thomas, J., Joseph, S., 2024. Impacts of recent rainfall changes on agricultural productivity and water resources within the Southern Western Ghats of Kerala, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 196(2), 115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-12270-x

[33]Felix, K.T., Govindarajan, P.L., Rashtrarakshak, V.P., 2025. Optimizing resource use efficiency for sustainable paddy production in South India—A regional study. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 9, 1665774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1665774

[34]Government of Andhra Pradesh, 2023. Socio Economic Survey 2022–23. Government of Andhra Pradesh: Amaravati, India. Available from: http://desweather.ap.gov.in/Pdfs/Socio-eco/Socio_Economic_Survey_2022-23.pdf

[35]Government of Andhra Pradesh, 2022. Socio-Economic Survey 2021–22. Government of Andhra Pradesh: Amaravati, India. Available from: https://www.scribd.com/document/565669593/AP-Socio-Economic-Survey-2021?utm_source=chatgpt.com

[36]Government of India, 2020. Handbook on Fisheries Statistics 2020. Government of India: New Delhi, India. Available from: https://www.dof.gov.in/static/uploads/2025/09/df5962d4c1cbaf9b18bb2a71e715c091.pdf

[37]Karamchedu, A., 2024. Responses to Livelihood Precarity in Dryland India: Diversifying Out of Agrarian Distress. Development and Change. 55(6), 1289–1314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12858

[38]Vandrangi, R., 2004. Urbanisation Trends in Andhra Pradesh: A Region-wise Study. The Asian Economic Review. 46(1), 68–82.

[39]Sayer, J., Boedhihartono, A.K., Langston, J.D., et al., 2021. Governance challenges to landscape restoration in Indonesia. Land Use Policy. 104, 104857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104857

[40]Kumar, K.K., Moharaj, P., 2023. Farm size and productivity relationship among the farming communities in India. Outlook on Agriculture. 52(2), 212–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270231176578

[41]Chakravorty, S., Chandrasekhar, S., Naraparaju, K., 2019. Land Distribution, Income Generation and Inequality in India’s Agricultural Sector. Review of Income and Wealth. 65(S1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12434

[42]Padhi, B., Sharma, H., 2023. Changing Contours of Growth and Employment in the Indian Labour Market: A Sectoral Decomposition Approach. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 67, 220–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2023.08.004

[43] Government of India, 2016. All India Report on Agriculture Census 2015–16. Government of India: New Delhi, India.

[44]Klein, J.W., 1948. Wool During World War II. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.320785

[45]Reddy, A.A., 2010. Disparities in Agricultural Productivity Growth in Andhra Pradesh. The Indian Economic Journal. 58(1), 134–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0019466220100109

[46]Government of India, 2022. Agricultural statistics at a glance 2022. Government of India: New Delhi, India.

[47]Singh, P., Shahi, B., Singh, K.M., 2016. Trends of Pulses Production, Consumption and Import in India: Current Scenario And Strategies. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2780102

[48]Government of India, n.d. National Food Security and Nutrition Mission. Government of India: New Delhi, India.

[49]Government of India, 2020. National Family Health Survey-5, 2019–20. Government of India: New Delhi, India. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/OF43/OF43.AP.pdf

[50]Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), 2019. Efficiency of Micro-Irrigation in economizing water use in India: Learning from potential and underexplored states. ICAR: New Delhi, India. Available from: https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2023-03/Efficiency%20of%20Micro-Irrigation%20in%20economizing%20water%20use%20in%20India%20Learning%20from%20potential%20and%20under%20explored%20states.pdf

[51]Sai, M., Prusty, A.K., Padhy, C., et al., 2024. Migration Behaviour of Rural Youth from Agriculture in North Coastal Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Extension Education. 60(4), 30–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2024.60406

[52]Government of India, 2022. Ground Water Year Book India 2021–22. Government of India: New Delhi, India.

[53]Hanes, J.K., 1961. Marketing Margins for Fall Potatoes. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA): Washington, DC, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.312567

[54]Hazenbosch, M., Sui, S., Isua, B., et al., 2021. Using locally available fertilisers to enhance the yields of swidden farmers in Papua New Guinea. Agricultural Systems. 192, 103089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103089

[55]ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research (IIRR), 2022. Annual Report 2022. ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research (IIRR): New Delhi, India.

[56]Alary, V., Lasseur, J., Frija, A., et al., 2022. Assessing the sustainability of livestock socio-ecosystems in the drylands through a set of indicators. Agricultural Systems. 198, 103389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103389

[57]Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, 2023. A glimpse of animal husbandry statistics (2022–23). Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying: New Delhi, India. Available from: https://dahd.gov.in/sites/default/files/2024-10/UpdatedCompendium2022-23.pdf

[58]Gu, Z., Pan, M., Liu, J., et al., 2022. Molecular cloning of AKT1 and AKT2 and their divergent responses to insulin and glucose at transcriptional level in the liver of Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. Aquaculture Reports. 23, 101066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2022.101066

[59]World Resources Institute, 2019. Creating a sustainable food future: A menu of solutions to feed nearly 10 billion people by 2050. World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA.

[60]Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2021. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2021. FAO: Rome, Italy.

[61]Chen, D., Wang, Y., Mehta, A.M., et al., 2025. Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Bibliometric Review of Global Trends and Regional Disparities. Sage Open. 15(4), 21582440251409851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251409851

[62]United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), 2022. World Population Prospects 2022. UNDESA: New York, NY, USA.

Online ISSN: 2737-4777, Print ISSN: 2737-4785, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.