Attaining Sustainable Enhancement in Crop Production Practices in the Turkestan Region: A Review of the Potential of Technological Innovations
Copyright © 2025 G.Zh. Akhmetova, P.T. Baineyeva, A.M. Yessirkepova, A.A. Alzhanova, Zh.T. Aliyeva. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
Abstract
Sustainable crop intensification (SCPI) is a system that allows for increasing the intensity of the use of land and non-agricultural resources in agricultural production without having a negative impact on the environment, as well as on those additional areas that are not suitable for agricultural purposes. SCPI is most suitable for the Turkestan region, characterized by favorable climatic and socio-economic conditions for the adaptation of the strategy. It should also be noted that many agricultural technologies have already been introduced in the region in accordance with relevant economic, cultural and traditional practices that can increase the vulnerability of agriculture to environmental changes. The purpose of this study is to coordinate the results of scientific research and the experience of farmers in maintaining production efficiency and observing environmental stability considerations in the conditions of the Turkestan region. In addition, given the fact that the rate of depletion of natural resources and the burden on ecosystems is increasing, more advanced and sustainable farming methods should be applied. Small farms, which currently occupy a significant part of the cultivated land in the region, should be supported by technological and policy innovations leading to the sustainable improvement of farms.
Keywords: Sustainable Crop Production; Precision Agriculture; Conservation Agriculture; Agroforestry; Mixed Cropping; Rainwater Harvesting
References
1.FAO, 2009. Global agriculture towards 2050, 12–13 October 2009. Available from: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/lon/HLEF2050_Global_Agricultre.pdf (cited 22 September 2024)
2.FAO, 2004. The state of food and agriculture 2003–2004.4 December 2004
3.Conway, G., 2012. Onebillion hungry: Can we feed the world. Cornel University Press: Ithaca,NY, USA. pp. page range. Cook, R.J., 2006. Towards cropping systems that enhance productivity and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(49), 18389–18394.
4.Frison, E., 2008. Biodiversity: Indispensable resources. Development and cooperation. 49(5), 190–193.
5.Joseph, C., 2020. Wold population 2020 overview. Available from: https://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/world-population-2020-overview (cited 31 March 2020
6.Bavel, J.V., 2013. The world population explosion: Causes, backgrounds and projections for the future. Facts, views & vision in ObGyn. 5(4), 281–291.
7.Bruinsma, J., 2009. The resource outlook to 2050: By how much do land, water use and crop yields need to increase by 2050?. Proceedings of the Expert Meeting on How to Feed the World in 2050; 24-26 June 2009, FAO Headquarters, Rome.
8.Godfray, H.C.J., Beddington, J., Crute, I.R., et al., 2010. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science. 327(5979), 812–818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383
9.Pretty, J., 2008. Agricultural sustainability: Concepts, principles and evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 363(1149), 447–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2163
10.Balmford, A., Green, R.E., Scharlemann, J.P.W., 2005. Global Change Biology. 11, 1594–1601.
11.IPCC, 2007. Fresh water resources and their management. In: Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P. (eds.). Climate Change 2007: Impact, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp.173–210.
12.Liang, L., Wang, Y., Ridoutt, B.G., et al., 2019. Agricultural subsidies assessment of cropping systemsfrom environmental and economic perspective in Noth China based on LCA. Ecological Indicators. 96, 351–360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.017
13.Balafoutis, A., Beck, B., Fountas, S., et al., 2017. Pecision agriculture technologies positively contributing to GHG emissions, mitigation, farm productivity and economics. Sustainability. 9, 1339–1367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081339
14.Griffin, T., Lowenberg‐DeBoer, J., 2005. Worldwide adoption and profitability of precision agriculture: Implications for Brazil. Revista de política agrícola. 14(4), 20–38.
15.Lowder, S., Skoet, J., Raney, T., 2016. The number, size and distribution of farms, smallholder farms and family farms worldwide. World Development. 87, 16–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.041
16.Jose, S., 2009. Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: An overview. Agroforestry Systems. 76(1), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7
17.Hobbs, R.J., 1989. The nature and effects of disturbance relative to invasions. In: Drake, J.A., Mooney, H.A., di Castri, F., et al. (eds.). Biological Invasions. A Global Perspective. Wiley: Chichester, England. pp. 389–405.
18.Kumar, A., Solanki, K.R., Singh, R., 2000. Effect of Wheat as intercrop on incidence of powdery mildew of ber (Zizyphus mauritiana), FACTRR. 4, 121–124.
19.Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Ambus, P., Jensen, E.S., 2001. Interspecific competition, N use and interference with weeds in pea-barley intercropping, Field Crops Research. 70(2), 101–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00126-5
20.Carpenter-Boggs, L., Reganold, J.P., Kennedy, A.C., 2000. Effects of biodynamic preparations on compost development. Biological and organic agriculture. 17(4), 313–328.
21.Adiku, S.G.K., Jones, J.W., Kumaga, F.K., et al., 2009. Effects of crop rotation and fallow residue management on maize growth, yield and soil carbon in a savannah-forest transition zone of Ghana. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 147(03), 313–322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960900851X
22.Sexton, P., Berg, R., Beck, D., 2019. Effect of cover crops on corn N requirements in a drought year. NO 9, 10 September 2019
23.Beck, D.L., 2003. Profitable no-till systems designed for producers in the North American great plains and prairies. Proceedings of the 6th Annual Northwest Direct Seed Cropping Systems Conference;
24.Series No. 10 Chapter 10 – Economics and Application of New Technology, May 1999; Pasco, WA. pp. 124-132
25.Pedersen, P., Lauer, J.G., 2004. Soybean growth and development response to rotation sequence and tillage system. Agronomy Journal. 96, 1005–1012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.1005
26.Karlen, D.L., Varvel, G.E., Bullock, D.G., et al., 1994. Crop rotations for the 21st century. Advances in Agronomy. 53, 1–45. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60611-2
27.Peterson, T.A., Varvel G.E., 1989. Crop yield as affected by rotation and nitrogen rate. II. Sorghum. Agronomy Journal. 81, 731–734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/10.2134/agronj1989.00021962008100050006x
28.Mannering, J.V., Griffith, D,R., 1981. Value of crop rotation under various tillage systems. Agronomy Guide AY-230, 8 May 1981 .
29.FAO, 2012. Conservation agriculture. Available from: http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/6c.html (cited 20 April 2012).
30.FAOSTAT, 2009. Conservation Agriculture Training guide for extension agents and farmers in Eastern Europe and Central Asia . Available from: http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx (2009).
31.Lehman, R.M., Cambardella, C.A., Scott, D.E., et al., 2015. Understanding and enhancing soil biological health: The solution for reversing soil degradation. Sustainability. 7, 988–1027.
32.Benitez, S., Shannon, L.O., Michael, L.R., 2017. Effects on maize seedling health and associated rhizosphere microbiome. Scientific Reports. 7, 15709. DOI: DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-15955-9 (cited 16 November 2017).
33.Nannipieri, P., Asche-Jenull, J., Ceccherini, M.T., 2003. Microbial divesity and soil functions. European Journal of Soil Science. 54(4), 655–670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1351-0754.2003.0556.x
34.Oweis, T., Hachum, A., Bruggeman, A., 2004. Indigenous water harvesting systems in West Asia and North Africa. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA): Aleppo, Syria. pp. 182.
35.Rockstrom, J., Falkenmark, M., 2015. Agriculture: Increase water harvesting in Africa. Nature. 519(7643), 283–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/519283a
36.Gallo, Jr.A., Odokonyero, K., Mousa, M.A.A., et al. 2021. Superhydrophobic sand mulches increase agricultural productivity in arid regions [preprint]. arXiv:2102.00495. – 2021.
37.Laiskhanov, S., Smanov, Z., Kaimuldinova, K., et al. 2023. Study of the ecological and reclamation condition of abandoned lands and their development for sustainable development goals. Sustainability. 15(19), 14181.
38.Guru P.N., Mridula, D., Dukare, A.S., et al. A comprehensive review on advances in storage pest management: Current scenario and future prospects. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 6, p.235.
39.Cassia, R., Nociono, M., Correa-Aragunde, N., et al., 2018. Climate change and the impact of greenhouse gases: CO2 and NO, friends and foes of plant oxidative stress. Frontiers in Plant Science. 1(9), 273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00273
40.Jensen, P.K., 2019. Use of integrated weed management tools in crop rotations with grass seed production. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science . 69, 209–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2018.1530295
41.Chetan, F., Rusu, T., Chetan, C., et al., 2016. Influence of soil tillage upon weeds, production and economic efficiency of corn crop. Agricultural and Food Sciences. 5, 36–43.
42.Rusinamhodzi, L., Corbeels, M., van Wijk, M.T., et al., 2011. A meta-analysis of long-term effects of conservation agricolture on maize grain yield under rain-fed condition. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 31, 657–673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0040-2
43.Farooq, M., Flower K,C., Jabran, K., et al., 2011. Crop yield and weed management in rainfed conservation agriculture. Soil and Tillage Research. 117, 172–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2011.10.001
44.Johnson, C.B., Moldenhauer, W.C., 1979. Effect of chisel versus moldboard plowing on soil erosion by water. Soil Science Society of America Journal 43, 177–179.
45.Chaves de Souza, V.F., Bertol, I., Wolschik, H., 2017. Effect of soil management practices on water erosion under natural rainfall conditionson humid dystrudept. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. 41, e0160443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/18069657rbcs20160443
46.Pisante, M., Corsi, S., Amir, K., et al., 2010. The challenge of agricultural sustainability for Asia and Europe. Transition Studies Review. 17, 662–667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11300-010-0181-z
47.Friedrich, T., Derpsch, R., Kassam, A., 2012. Overview of the global spread of conservation agriculture. Field Actions Science Reports. 6(1), p.23, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2018.1494927
48.Malhi, S.S., Nyborg, M., Goddard, T., et al., 2011a. Long-term tillage, straw and N rate effects on some chemical properties in two contrasting soil types in Western Canada. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 90(1), 133–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-010-9417-x
49.Foley, J.A., Defries, R., Asner, G.P., et. al., 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science. 309(5734), 570–574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772
50.Evenson, E., Gollin, D., Evenson, R.E., et al., 2003. Crop variety improvement and its effect on productivity: The impact of international agricultural research. CABI: Wallingford, UK. pp. 473–479
51.Francesco, N.T., Mirella, S., Simone, R., et al., 2013. The FAOSTAT database of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. Environmental Research Letters 8, 015009.
52.Kumar, K., Gambhir, G., Dass, A., et al., 2020. Genetically modified crops: Current status and future prospects. Planta. 251(4), 91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-020-03372-8
53.Klümper, W., Qaim, M., 2014. A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. PLoS ONE, 3(9), e111629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111629
54.Oerke, E.C., 2006. Crop losses to pests. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 144(01), 31–43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859605005708
55.Larson, S.J., Capel, P.D., Majewski, M.S., 1997. Pesticides in surface waters—distribution, trends, and governing factors. In: Gilliom, R.J. (ed.). Series of Pesticides in Hydrologic System. Ann Arbor Press: Chelsea, MI, U.S. pp. 400.
56.Arias-Estevez, M., Lopez-Periago, E., Martinez-Carballo, E., et al., 2008. The mobility and degradation of pesticides in soils and the pollution of groundwater resources. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 123(4), 247–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.07.011
57.López-Flores, R., Quintana, X.D., Salvadó, V., et al., 2003. Comparison of nutrient and contaminant fluxes in two areas with different hydrological regimes (Empordà Wetlands, NE Spain). Water Research. 37, 3034–3046. DOI: doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00109-X.
58.Hijosa-Valsero, M., Bécares, E., Fernández-Aláez, C., et al., 2016. Chemical pollution in inland shallow lakes in the Mediterranean region (NW Spain): PAHs, insecticides and herbicides in water and sediments. The Science of the Total Environment. 544(10–11), 797–810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.160
59.Santadino, M., Coviella, C., Momo, F., 2014. Glyphosate sublethal effects on the population dynamics of the earthworm Eisenia fetida (Savigny, 1826). Water, Air, & Soil Pollution.. 225, 2207.
60.Agrawal, A., 2011. Evolutionary ecology of plant defences: current trends in evolutionary ecology of plant defence. Functional Ecology. 25(2), 420–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01796.x
61.Machado, S.C., Martins, I., 2018. Risk assessment of occupational pesticide exposure: Use of endpoints and surrogates. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 98, 276–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.08.008
62.Bengtsson, J., Ahnström, J., Weibull, A.C., 2005. The effects of organic farming on biodiversity and abundance: a meta‐analysisJournal of Applied Ecology. 42, 261–269. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01005.x