Home
Open Access

Research on World Agricultural Economy

PDF

Issue

Volume 2 Issue 4 (December 2021)

Section

Article

How to Cite

Loading...

Comparative Study on Profitability of Sorghum-Legumes Intercropping Systems in Ethiopia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v2i4.450

Received: 10 September 2021; Accepted: 27 September 2021; Published Online: 30 September 2021

Copyright © 2021 Dessalegn Ayana Deressa. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.

Abstract

The imbalance between the crop production and population growth is currently the major issue in Ethiopia. To feed the growing population, increasing the production of food through growing more crop types in the same field as an intercropping is the right strategy. The study was aimed at evaluating the profitability of sorghum-legume intercropping on yield of sorghum. Intercropping sorghum with legumes crops increases the land productivity as its Land Equivalent Ratio is greater than one. In these cases, the land equivalent ratio is greater than one indicating the benefits of intercropping.  In general, legume crops contributed to the yield of sorghum either intercropped with legume or grown up using residual contribution of legumes after a year. Therefore, for maximum sorghum production, farmers should plant either as intercrop or after residual effect of legumes crops. In addition to agronomic parameters used to compare the advantages of any cropping system in small scale farming conditions, total gross monetary value is also used to evaluate economic advantages of intercropping system.

Keywords: Intercropping, Sorghum, Legumes, LER, Monetary value index

References

[1] Lithourgidis, A.S., Vlachostergios, D.N., Dordas, C.A. and Damalas, C.A. 2011. Dry matter yield, nitrogen content, and competition in pea–cereal intercropping systems. European J. Agron. 34(4): 287-294.

[2] Yadav, R.L., Prasad, K. and Dwivedi, B.S. (1998). Cropping systems research. Pp. 193-213. In: R.L Yadav, P. Singh, and R. Prasad and I.P.S. Ahlawat (eds.). Fifty years of agronomic research in India. Indian Society of Agronomy, New Delhi, India.

[3] Usmanikhail, M.U., Tunio, S.D., Jamro, G.H., Oad, F.C., Hassan, S.W., Chachar, Q.D., Khanzada, M.A. and Gandahi, A.W. 2012. Agronomic and economic effect of intercropping sugar beet with oilseeds and lentil. Pak. J. Bot. 44(6): 1983-1988.

[4] Nasri, R., Kashani, A., Barary, M., Paknejad, F. and Vazan, S. 2014. Nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency and the productivity of wheat in double cropping system under different rates of nitrogen. Int. J. Biosci. 4: 184–193.

[5] Seran, T.H. and Brintha, I. 2010. Review of maize based intercropping. J. Agron. 9(3): 135-145. Willey, R. 1979. Intercropping-its importance and research needs: Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. In: Field Crop Abstracts. 32: 1-10.

[6] Emam, Y. 2003. Cereal Production, Tehran University Press, Iran. 188p. Nurbakhsh, F., Koocheki, A. and Mahallati, M.N. 2013. Evaluation of yield, yield components and different intercropping indices in mixed and row intercropping of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Int. J. Agric. Crop Sci. 5(17): 1958-1965.

[7] Amanullah, M.M., Vaiyapuri, K., Alagesan, A., Somasundaram, E., Sathyamoorthi, K. and Pazhanivelan, S. 2006. Effect of intercropping and organic manures on the yield and biological efficiency of cassava intercropping system (Manihot esculenta Crantz.). Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2(5): 201-208.

[8] Kurata, T. 1986. A study on the farming system in USSA. Quert. J. Agro. Eco. 26: 179-205.

[9] Kinde Lamessa, Sharma J.J and Taye Tessema.2015.Influence of Cowpea and Soybean Intercropping Pattern and Time of Planting on Yield and Gross Monetary Value of Sorghum, Journal of Sci. Technol. Arts Res. J., July-Sep 2015, 4(3): 38-46

Online ISSN: 2737-4777, Print ISSN: 2737-4785, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.